Published by George September 18th, 2007
in Music Video.
Michael Grodner seems to have a sense for film, although it’s more of a feeling rather than a shooting style. I look for these things. I watch for them and when they’re there, I see them. Something is telling me this video is better than I think it is. I can’t place it. I sit and watch. I scrutinize. I want to hate it. No shot is amazing. Nothing blows me away. But I see something in between the frames. I feel an intimacy with the film. The feeling of color. The style of shot selection. The intimacy of the close-ups with the band and their life that seems real — basically just people being infected by ‘da na do dum dum dum’. The film is full of film tells; freeze frame, film burn, jump cuts, shots of backstage/doc footage. The story is simple. The video is simple, but like the song, it is catchy. It complements the song. It does its job (which is rare even for great music videos) and every time it hits the ears of someone new, that song infects a new person and I become a little more attached to the video. I see those freeze frames and split screens and am a little happier each time. What you realize by the end is that all you can hear is the ‘da na do dum dum dum’. And now he has you.
Published by michelle September 14th, 2007
in Editorial.
About a month ago, the ‘almighty’ Pitchfork introduced a new feature on their site. However, it didn’t receive a whole lot of fanfare; I suspect because it’s mostly boring. The idea is a combination of a mix tape and an interview. Picture it: a hip dj puts together an exclusive mix for […]
Published by James September 12th, 2007
in Editorial.
30Frames brings up some interesting questions concerning Apple and their role in the music industry. His tone is one of frustration and defeat: he works in the MV industry and reaps little benefit or reward. Apple on the other hand, who doesn’t really create songs or videos but rather sells them, makes a killing off the music industry. The confusion and emotion of the piece is clear: Apple making more money off of music than the content creators and to hell with them for doing so. While this all makes sense it’s based on a faulty premise: Apple makes a lot of money selling music. Unfortunately, this premise, while technically true, is patently false. Apple makes a lot (I don’t have enough html bold commands to stress that “lot”) of money, but not by selling music. They make it by selling music players: iPods (and iPhones and other iGadgetry). Apple outsmarted the music industry by avoiding it. Apple uses music as an excuse to sell something else. Apple out-MTVed MTV.
Published by Los September 11th, 2007
in Music Video.
The kids are back in school. The weather is calming itself. And films are cutting the excessive fat we call Spectacle in exchange for Depth. Fall is upon us. And who better than
The National to usher us in to the golden season with class.
[Visit
Shots Ring Out to read the rest…]
Published by James September 10th, 2007
in Notable.
Douchebag post of the week goes to: Idolator for their snarky and typically elitist “Ohh, let’s hate Feist now that she’s popular” post. When your writing is more hackneyed than the music you are trying to criticize, it’s time to rethink your strategy.
No tag for this post.
related posts
No related posts.
Published by James September 10th, 2007
in Editorial.
MTV’s Video Music Awards were yesterday. While you’d think a site devoted to videos and music such as this one would be all over that, it’s no secret that the VMAs have about as much to do with Music Videos as Country Time Lemonade has to do with lemons or tasting good. We could talk […]