<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dealers Wanted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/</link>
	<description>Music Video Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:23:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Videogum: Music video blog gossip disguised as news! at Shots Ring Out</title>
		<link>http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-5772</link>
		<dc:creator>Videogum: Music video blog gossip disguised as news! at Shots Ring Out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shotsringout.com/?p=217#comment-5772</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember when I declared that music video on the internet needs dealers? Remember when I asked who would be the Pitchfork or Stereogum of the music video world? Well, we&#8217;re getting closer to having an answer. Who is it? Uh, Pitchfork and Stereogum, actually. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember when I declared that music video on the internet needs dealers? Remember when I asked who would be the Pitchfork or Stereogum of the music video world? Well, we&#8217;re getting closer to having an answer. Who is it? Uh, Pitchfork and Stereogum, actually. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KS</title>
		<link>http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>KS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shotsringout.com/?p=217#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>Ignoring MTV, I know another player in the purely online music video dealing game: Superette
WE EXIST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignoring MTV, I know another player in the purely online music video dealing game: Superette<br />
WE EXIST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Look &#187; Блогоскоп №14</title>
		<link>http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Look &#187; Блогоскоп №14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shotsringout.com/?p=217#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>[...] Очередная дискуссия вокруг будущего музыкальных видеоклипов: видеоблог Shots Ring Out критикует распространённую в последнее время точку зрения, считающую YouTube «новым MTV». По его мнению, YouTube и аналогичные системы, напрямую доставляющие видео-контент пользователям, принципиально пока не способны заменить реальные теле- и т.п. каналы, транслирующие видео-ролики. Главная проблема этих систем – отсутствие адекватного «среднего звена» (автор блога предлагает называть их дилерами), того или тех либо программ, либо людей и их коллективов, которые будут среди всего предлагаемого сайтом моря видео-информации отбирать всё самое, по их мнению, заслуживающее внимания; без этого звена любой медиа-архив со временем превращается в информационную «помойку». Частично функцию «дилеров» выполняют считанные по пальцам рук видео-блоги наподобие самого Shots Ring Out и некоторые интернет-сообщества – но их слишком мало и в целом они неэффективны. На это блог 30 frames уже традиционно ему возражает, считая, что появление таких «дилеров» – дело ближайшего будущего, связанного с бурным развитием технологий веб-видео. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Очередная дискуссия вокруг будущего музыкальных видеоклипов: видеоблог Shots Ring Out критикует распространённую в последнее время точку зрения, считающую YouTube «новым MTV». По его мнению, YouTube и аналогичные системы, напрямую доставляющие видео-контент пользователям, принципиально пока не способны заменить реальные теле- и т.п. каналы, транслирующие видео-ролики. Главная проблема этих систем – отсутствие адекватного «среднего звена» (автор блога предлагает называть их дилерами), того или тех либо программ, либо людей и их коллективов, которые будут среди всего предлагаемого сайтом моря видео-информации отбирать всё самое, по их мнению, заслуживающее внимания; без этого звена любой медиа-архив со временем превращается в информационную «помойку». Частично функцию «дилеров» выполняют считанные по пальцам рук видео-блоги наподобие самого Shots Ring Out и некоторые интернет-сообщества – но их слишком мало и в целом они неэффективны. На это блог 30 frames уже традиционно ему возражает, считая, что появление таких «дилеров» – дело ближайшего будущего, связанного с бурным развитием технологий веб-видео. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shotsringout.com/?p=217#comment-2341</guid>
		<description>Thanks, James, but I must have lost the invitation to that party. I think, however, I went like two days later for my birthday. I don’t see how the helps with my inability to bring Brick to the unknowing public. Maybe if I was a dealer they would listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, James, but I must have lost the invitation to that party. I think, however, I went like two days later for my birthday. I don’t see how the helps with my inability to bring Brick to the unknowing public. Maybe if I was a dealer they would listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-2338</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shotsringout.com/?p=217#comment-2338</guid>
		<description>The goal, George, is that you should have saw Brick at the ArcLight with Brian and I when it came out rather than jumping on the train a year later. You could have helped us recommend it to an indecisive Kevin Smith in the lobby.

I did neglect the whole iTunes angle here, mostly because numbers from Apple are vague at best. I&#039;m guessing their music video sales are not quite up there with the TV shows (or movies, even). Half price would be a start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The goal, George, is that you should have saw Brick at the ArcLight with Brian and I when it came out rather than jumping on the train a year later. You could have helped us recommend it to an indecisive Kevin Smith in the lobby.</p>
<p>I did neglect the whole iTunes angle here, mostly because numbers from Apple are vague at best. I&#8217;m guessing their music video sales are not quite up there with the TV shows (or movies, even). Half price would be a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-2327</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shotsringout.com/?p=217#comment-2327</guid>
		<description>music videos will be revolutionary again when you can buy them on iTunes for the same price as a single.

the success of video ipods will determine this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>music videos will be revolutionary again when you can buy them on iTunes for the same price as a single.</p>
<p>the success of video ipods will determine this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-2227</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 02:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shotsringout.com/?p=217#comment-2227</guid>
		<description>So, what would be the end goal in all this? Yes your &lt;i&gt;tastes &lt;/i&gt;are bomb. That is why people come here but people’s taste in general, suck. Hence the not so new MTV and the diabolic shows it puts out. I face a similar problem every time I talk about &lt;i&gt;Brick&lt;/i&gt;. I could show people the film but the best response I would ever get would be “It’s interesting.” Mainly because they don’t understand the complexity of the film and how badass it really is. So, what is the end goal? To become popular enough to get everyone who should watch cool music videos to watch them but not big enough to get everyone to watch them? Or B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what would be the end goal in all this? Yes your <i>tastes </i>are bomb. That is why people come here but people’s taste in general, suck. Hence the not so new MTV and the diabolic shows it puts out. I face a similar problem every time I talk about <i>Brick</i>. I could show people the film but the best response I would ever get would be “It’s interesting.” Mainly because they don’t understand the complexity of the film and how badass it really is. So, what is the end goal? To become popular enough to get everyone who should watch cool music videos to watch them but not big enough to get everyone to watch them? Or B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los</title>
		<link>http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-2084</link>
		<dc:creator>Los</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shotsringout.com/?p=217#comment-2084</guid>
		<description>Damn Jimmy Jam, I hope you copyrighted that &lt;i&gt;&quot;Real World/Road Rules Challenge 42: Whiny Bitches in Nebraska&quot;&lt;/i&gt; idea.  It&#039;s too ridiculous not to produce!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn Jimmy Jam, I hope you copyrighted that <i>&#8220;Real World/Road Rules Challenge 42: Whiny Bitches in Nebraska&#8221;</i> idea.  It&#8217;s too ridiculous not to produce!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: *janet*</title>
		<link>http://www.shotsringout.com/2006/12/dealers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>*janet*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 09:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shotsringout.com/?p=217#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>I agree.  We readers can find these videos on our own if we wanted to, but we come to SRO as consumers of your &quot;taste&quot; in music videos.  That&#039;s also why your holiday gift guide was such a hit - we agree in your taste in music &amp; music videos, and so it&#039;s only natural that that taste translates into excellent taste in material goodies too.  [Shit now the word &quot;taste&quot; looks mega weird.]  Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  We readers can find these videos on our own if we wanted to, but we come to SRO as consumers of your &#8220;taste&#8221; in music videos.  That&#8217;s also why your holiday gift guide was such a hit &#8211; we agree in your taste in music &amp; music videos, and so it&#8217;s only natural that that taste translates into excellent taste in material goodies too.  [Shit now the word "taste" looks mega weird.]  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
